Fictive Interaction (the intersection of language, interaction, and cognition), Cognitive Linguistics (mental spaces and conceptual blending), Discourse Studies, Argumentation, Language pathology.
I am mostly interested in the interrelation between language, interaction and cognition. If human babies learn to interact long before they learn to speak, and if face-to-face conversation is the most common form of communication, I am interested in looking into the question: how is the structure of interaction reflected in language structure and language use? That is, what forms does the basic interactional pattern of turn-taking take in grammar and discourse? In addition, I’m interested in the communicative functions and effectiveness of interactional structures embedded in discourse.
From a linguistic perspective I am mostly interested in what I’ve called ‘fictive interaction’ (Pascual 2002, 2006, 2014), a cognitive phenomenon that reflects the interactional structure of conversation, and is manifested in language structure and use. Fictive interaction occurs at different levels: (i) the level of the discourse (monologue conceptualized as dialogue); (ii) the sentence (rhetorical questions); (iii) the clause (“They thought, hey, I may find it”); (iv) the phrase (“the attitude of yes, I can do it”); and (v) the word (“forget-me-nots”, “a ‘what’s in it for me?’ attitude”).
I have mainly studied fictive interaction in courtroom settings. Due to the crucial role of talk-in-interaction in the courtroom, courtroom settings dramatically illustrate the power and effectiveness of fictive interaction. Lawyers often use fictive interaction as a communicative strategy: (i) they use the question-answer pattern to organize their discourse (“Did he log onto a computer that night at work? No. Did he log onto a computer at home? No. Did he…”, Pascual 2006a); (ii) they use fictive enunciations in order to refer to non-verbal referents (“He’s creating the appearance that, Look, everybody, look at what a great husband I am”, Pascual 2006b); (iii) they attribute speech to pieces of evidence (“That’s not what the bullet tells me”, Pascual 2002); (iv) they portray the deceased victim as speaking up (“a murder victim testifying through evidence”, Coulson & Pascual 2006, Pascual 2008a, 2008b); and (v) they present the final verdict as an act of communication (“a verdict that says: ‘you are free to go’”, Pascual 2008a).
– Universiteitskrant, University of Groningen, 2012
– Nieuwsbrief Faculteit der Letteren, University of Groningen, 2010
– Nieuwsbrief Faculteit der Letteren, VU University Amsterdam, 2008
– Planned: “Interactional Cognitive Linguistics: Fictive speech at work”, Plenary lecture at the 11th China Cognitive Linguistics conference, Beijing International Studies University, Beijing, 2-3 November 2019.
– “Literacy and cognition: Effects on grammar and discourse”, Plenary lecture at the international Language and Cognition symposium, Dalian University, Dalian, China, 15-16 Jun 2019.
– “Autism: Diagnosis, treatment, and the road ahead”, ‘Green Apple Children Therapy Center’, Hangzhou, China, 30 Mar 2019.
– “Working smarter: Time management, setting goals, and more”, ‘Ling-Lunch’ lecture, Dept. of Linguistics, School of International Studies at Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 12 Mar 2019.
– “The grammar of orality”. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. 6 Feb 2019.
– “Fictive interaction metaphors: Conversation as Source Domain in Thought and Language”, Plenary lecture, International Forum on Cognition, Metaphor and Thought, School of Foreign Studies, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, China, 29 Dec 2018.
– “Conversational structures in languages with and without writing”, Dept. of Social Sciences, Pablo de Olavide University, Sevilla, Spain, 26 Feb 2018.
– “Fictive interaction constructions: Finding intersubjectivity in grammar”. Dept. of Modern Philology, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain, 9 Feb 2018.
– “A link between detail-oriented vision and speech? Two elicitation studies of Brazilian and Chinese children with autism”, 4rth Attentive Listener in the Visual World (AttLis) expert workshop, Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Birla Institute of Technology and Sciences, Pilani, K K., Goa, India, 3-4 March 2017.
– “The Conversation Frame as driving force in language structure and use”, School of English Studies (SES), Shanghai International Studies University (SISU), Shanghai, China, 11 Dec 2017.
– “Linguistic meaning as emerging from talk-in-interaction”, 68th Distinguished Scholar Lecture Series, School of Foreign Languages, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, 15 May 2017.
– “Culture as a way of thinking: Similarities and differences between metaphors across languages”, ‘The Windows of the Exchange’, Zhejiang University, 6 May 2017.
– “How Language Mirrors Conversation: A cross-linguistic study”, Plenary lecture, Yearly Conference of the Zhejiang Province Foreign Languages Association, Taizhou University, Taizhou, China, 28 Oct 2016.
– “The conversational nature of language: From cognition and grammar to expert communication and language pathology”, Plenary lecture at the 2nd Conference of the International Association for Cognitive Semiotics, Marie Curie-Sklodowska University, Lublin, Poland, 20-22 June 2016. [Abstract]
– “When ‘Alô!’ means telephone: Non-constructed speech for non-reports by children with autism”, expert workshop ‘Between Direct and Indirect Speech’, University of Groningen, the Netherlands, 19 February 2016.
– “The conversational basis of grammar: From non-written languages to language pathology”, keynote address, ‘Yearly senior academic forum of the School of International Studies’, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 18 December 2015.
– “Conversations within conversations: Fictive interaction in discourse, grammar and language pathology”, job talk, School of International Studies at Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 22 May 2015.
– “The conversational mind: Fictive interaction in everyday, professional, and aphasic discourse”, Dept. of Cognitive Science, Hunan University, Changsha, China, 16 May 2014.
– “‘Says who?’: Fictive interaction as communicative strategy in language for specific purposes”, Foreign Language School of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, 13 May 2014.
– “‘Say it with a conversation’: Fictive interaction as cognitive, communicative and linguistic phenomenon”, School of International Studies at Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 6 May 2014.
– “A ‘do-it-yourself’ construction: Forms and functions of fictive interaction across languages and discourse genres”, School of International Studies at Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 5 May 2014.
– “‘The What?’: The conversation frame in thought, grammar, and discourse”, ‘Grammar and Cognition’ group, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands, 11 Sep 2013.
– “When direct speech is not reported speech (or thought): An overview”, ‘Quotation and Depiction in Interaction’ Workshop, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, 8 Mar 2013.
– “The Conversation as a frame in language, discourse and cognition”, Dept. of Cognitive Science, Case Western Reserve University (Cleveland, U.S.A.), 18 Apr 2011.
– “Fictive interaction as argumentative strategy in murder trials”, VU Amsterdam, 23 Apr 2011.
– (with R. Groenewold) “Deze is van ‘hee hier ben ik hoor, zie je me nog wel?’” Fictieve interactie in (semi-)spontane taal van afasiepatiënten” [“This is like ‘hey here I am, do you see me yet?’ Fictive interaction in (semi)spontaneous speech of aphasic patients”], STAK Foundation Aphasic Therapy Amsterdam (SAA), Haarlem, the Netherlands, 15 Jan 2011.
– “Mendigo o pordiosero?: Interacción fictiva en español” [“Beggar or ‘byGoder’: Fictive interaction in Spanish”], Dept. of Translation and Language Sciences, University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain, 24 Nov 2010.
– “The conversation frame: Linguistic forms and communicative functions in discourse”, work visit by the University Board of Directors, University of Groningen, the Netherlands, 16 Jun 2010.
– “Talk within talk: Fictive interaction as a simplex blend”, Blending and Discourse workshop, Centre for Social Practices and Cognition (SoPraCon), University of Southern Denmark, 1 Mar 2010.
– “Discours au tribunal: La production par le procureur du témoignage de la victime” [Discourse in court: The prosecutor’s presentation of the victim’s testimony], Dépt. des sciences de la société, University of Friburg, Switzerland, 13 Nov 2007.
– “(Aan)sprekende metaforen van vanzelfsprekend bewijs: Interactie en argumentatie in Amerikaanse, Vlaamse en Nederlandse strafrechtzaken” [“Telling metaphors and evidence that speaks for itself: Interaction and argumentation in American, Flemish and Dutch criminal trials”]. Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum (WODC), Ministry of Justice, The Hague, the Netherlands, 10 Oct 2006.
– “Text for context, trial for trialogue: Studying legal discourse through following a prosecutor around,” Panel ‘The pragmatics of institutional discourse: A panel honoring the work of Aaron V. Cicourel,’ chaired by Prof. Ch. Briggs, 9th International Pragmatics Conference. Riva del Garda, Italy, 12 Jul 2005.
– “Courtroom blends: Conceptual blending and fictive interaction in judicial argumentation,” Videoconference, Dept. of English, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A., 14 Oct 2004.
– “Tips voor het schrijven van een proefschrift” [Tips for writing a PhD dissertation], Proefschriftendag [PhD day], VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 8 May 2003.
– “On a blend type: Fictive interaction networks across the literature and as manifested in judicial settings,” ‘The Blending Workshop,’ Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van België (KVAB), Brussels, Belgium, 1 Apr 2003.
– “Fictive interaction or the intersection of language, interaction, and cognition”, Linguistics seminar, Department of Linguistics, University of Wales at Bangor, United Kingdom, 5 Feb 2003.
– (with M. Poblet) “Problemas de comunicación en los Tribunales de Justicia: Análisis de interrogatorios” [Communication problems in Courts of Justice: Analysis of witness questioning], Workshop on ‘Oral communication techniques’, Spanish General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ), Madrid, Spain, 6 Oct 1998.
– (with M. Poblet) “Preguntes retòriques i inferències als Tribunals de Justícia” [Rhetorical questions and inferences in court], Workshop on ‘Sociology of law: Interaction, organization, profession,’ Institut de Ciències Polítiques i Socials, Barcelona, Spain, 22 Sep 1998.